Scientists who study sexual arousal have found that when they show participants a pornographic video, many people (especially women) show signs of genital arousal while simultaneously reporting that they do not feel aroused. This so-called arousal “nonconcordance” has presented a conundrum for researchers—which measure is the more valid way of determining what a participant truly wants and desires?
Some have argued that genital measures are the main ones we should look at because “genitals don’t lie.” However, others have argued that the way our bodies respond to a given stimulus doesn’t necessarily reflect how we feel about it—and that’s precisely the point sex educator and author Emily Nagoski makes in the TED Talk below.
As Nagoski argues: “Genital response just means it was a sex-related stimulus; it doesn't mean it was wanted or liked, and it certainly doesn't mean it was consented to.” She explains this brilliantly by making an analogy to Pavlov’s dogs. Pavlov conditioned dogs to salivate in response to the ringing of a bell by repeatedly pairing the ringing of a bell with the presentation of meat powder. Eventually, the dogs began to salivate in response to the bell alone—but does that mean that these dogs actually wanted to eat the bell? Nope.
Check out the full video below to learn more.
Watch more videos on the science of sex here.
Want to learn more about Sex and Psychology? Click here for previous articles or follow the blog on Facebook (facebook.com/psychologyofsex), Twitter (@JustinLehmiller), or Reddit (reddit.com/r/psychologyofsex) to receive updates.
Image Source: 123RF/fuzzbones
You Might Also Like: